A Beginner’s Guide to POC, MVP, and Prototype

When initiating the mobile application validation process, many enterprises tussle to opt whether they should work on the prototype, proof of concept, MVP, or if they should opt for a combination of all three. No business can make the decision without any knowledge about it, and understanding these concepts is highly recommended. That is because it can ominously improve the end product and is beneficial when it comes to acquiring the funds as the project costs will be reduced up to a certain level. Knowing the right choice will help you strengthen your place in the mobile application market.

Before you dive in to understand the tech stuff and mobile application development in Los Angeles, it is essential to consider what you are trying to build. POC, MVP, and prototype, all these three methods are for the product validation as they can eliminate the devastating effects of technical challenges, define the perspicuous direction for the growth in mobile app market while taking user needs into consideration. With the spot-on product validation strategy, as a business, you will be able to make a strong statement in front of the investors and provide a return on investment.

Proof of Concept (POC)

As the name suggests, POC focuses if the concept is feasible enough to invest in. It can be named as the most precise yet the most efficient way to validate your application concept while putting a focus on the target users and the forecasted challenges. When businesses decide to implement POC validation strategy, it is to find out yes or no to their concept explaining if the idea is practical or not.

The POC approach in application development is an internal yet the small project to determine the application functionality and to verify if the concept is worthwhile to invest in. With POC, the businesses have the leverage to share knowledge internally about the stapling functionality of the application. However, POC does not focus on UX as it is time-consuming and can hinder the viability calculations. As we have already mentioned that POC is implemented to find the yes or no for the product, however, if the concept results unviable, businesses can focus on finding other solutions.

POC development is helpful if you are creating one-of-the type application, and the concept is unique in the market. Furthermore, it can help differentiate your idea from the assumed competitors and their products. For instance, if the enterprise is working on creating a messaging app, it is evident that the concept is feasible, but alongside, it has massive competition. The result of POC will be yes, but the assimilation of unique features will be suggested.

Minimum Viable Product (MVP)

MVP focuses on the fundamental features and functionalities of the application while describing its value proposition. It is the practical and minimal form the end application, which is launched to test its feasibility in the market. It is an excellent product validation strategy to observe the audience perception about the mobile application and how they are responding to it. In the end, you will be able to create insightful steps to improve the overall application’s interface and functionality. Minimum viable product is an iterative process which enables businesses to focus on lacking points and creating solutions for the target audiences’ needs. With MVP, businesses are enabled to test the features of the application in the real market by gaining insights about the usability, product viability, product assumptions, and market demand. It helps businesses cut down the development costs by creating an intuitive and polished application with minimal features to improve intelligence factors.

MVP is the most effective strategy as it reduces the development costs of the application and as a result, creates an application with polished features. It helps businesses incorporate the use of intelligence factors to initiate the application. 

  • MVP helps businesses test the key hypothesis of the application while collecting user information and perspective to improve the end product
  • It helps businesses cut costs by using the return on investment from the initial versions to improve the later ones
  • It helps businesses gather information insights about the user base and conclude what works for them and what does not

Prototype

The prototype focuses on concluding the product functionality and the answers the “hows.” This product validation strategy reflects the design direction of the application, and it is an illustration of the end product’s functionality. With the prototyping, you will be able to see how the app will feel and look. This information can be analyzed to conclude if it is in-line with the target audience’s demands. Prototyping helps users make critical changes in the initial stage rather than having to invest effort and money at the development stage. This is because when the UX has been developed, and then changes are required, it can be a dent to the finances.

The core function of the prototype is to converse the navigational flow and UX to improve the overall development efficiency. Putting in a nutshell, prototype helps users identify and fix the first stage application errors when they are easy and economical to manage.

Conclusion

All three methods are effective as long as they are helping businesses improve their application concept as they have differentiating advantages and in order to make a decision, businesses will have to drop down the prerequisites of the application concept. This is because there is no hard and fast rule to this decision because it helps in validating the application and its place in the application market.

About the Author

Aron dell is a content creator at App Peanuts, who has a flair for integrating rich data with creativity to deliver the information with extreme precision.